Some dumb
things we at CLC say and do (but, still always learn from):
Look at the course title. Look at the course
description. Where's the "less"?
I though I would have fun (and I did) bringing the old
technology called hyper-texting to a rather buzz-wordy so-and-so blah-dee-bla course
description. The add-ons make the course description "less" for women, and
a little more for men, too. I was going for a balance in this project.
Geeks and nerds were not left behind!
Other links of special interest have been added for further
interest. Notice the lighter colored words as opposed to the yellower
colored words in the above description. Hover your mouse pointer over
them, then click. Have fun.
ONE SUBMITTED FOR YOUR APPROVAL on May 26th, 2006 by Dan
Prowse, Jr. (Don't shoot me, Clint!)
The names were changed to obfuscate those who, although
they may know how to pronounce Latin, others certainly do not know its proper usage nor
spelling [or do they?]:
" Frankly [sir or madam], I
simply don't believe you. Your series of adhominen attacks would not seem to me
to be that productive."
[Mr. One who no speaky the Latin very well]
Aside from the spelling of ad hominem, the use of
this epithet is in itself the best definition and most classic use of ad hominem.
Because of this, I would be making moot to bring in the examples called
out by the accused referred. In
addition, one could surmise that the second sentence quoted above is not, but a fragment.
Perhaps a bit of the Canadian humor applied here would be best, restated, as in: "Liar
!... Your
series of adhominen attacks would not seem to me to be that productive...if we
were seeming to be seemingly productive...".
Just think of Mike Myers in "Austin Powers" "ALLOW MYSELF
TO INTRODUCE....MY SELF..."; as after all, it can all depend on "...what your definition of
is is.".
To the accuser or accused: You are "mature" enough, so why
does not one of you make like George W., and ask the other "Can I buy you
dinner?", as our President recently asked of Mr. Tony Blair after a surprisingly
revealing press conference today?
On my other hand: Perhaps this is just a smoke
screen. All of it. The back and forth bickering, or what could
amount to bickering. I posit that perhaps, if there are too many
unilateral votes in approval of all things considered and wished for, then maybe
there is a reason one would want to examine "the list".
Should I run for a position? I just might. It's
probably in my blood, as my Dad held similar position for most of his life:
I scare myself to think of doing this - more than it might scare you of me
actually doing! Yet, I keep my "hat" on while several incumbents have gone
out of their way to nod approval and shake my hand for what I have been doing -
not just this.
BOO!
Now, if I had a third hand (obviating the need for a third
arm hopefully); on my third I might go so far to say that perhaps the use of ad
hominem was correctly applied here and therefore is the best way to show its
harmful affects - and this case, I would applaud! More than likely, this
is the case - but I only have 2 arms, and I'm damned grateful to have them.
Fallacy: Ad Hominem
Translated from Latin to English, "Ad Hominem" means "against the man" or
"against the person."
An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument
is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the
person presenting the claim or argument. Typically, this fallacy involves two
steps. First, an attack against the character of person making the claim, her
circumstances, or her actions is made (or the character, circumstances, or
actions of the person reporting the claim). Second, this attack is taken to be
evidence against the claim or argument the person in question is making (or
presenting). This type of "argument" has the following form:
- Person A makes claim X.
- Person B makes an attack on person A.
- Therefore A's claim is false.
The reason why an Ad Hominem (of any kind) is a fallacy is that the
character, circumstances, or actions of a person do not (in most cases) have a
bearing on the truth or falsity of the claim being made (or the quality of the
argument being made).
- Bill: "I believe that abortion is morally wrong."
Dave: "Of course you would say that, you're a priest."
Bill: "What about the arguments I gave to support my position?"
Dave: "Those don't count. Like I said, you're a priest, so you have to say
that abortion is wrong. Further, you are just a lackey to the Pope, so I
can't believe what you say."
And anither thing;
This was sent All Distro a while back, and now I remember
why I do not have to care about absolutely everything when I see drivel like
this:
" Career and Placement Services would like
for you to spread the word about April being Career Development
Month. We have planned career workshops, a career panelist, a mini job fair, a
small business fair, and a etiquette dinner for students, staff, job seekers and
faculty. Human Resources Representatives from various compaines will be here to
give you a wealth of information on various job search techniques to "Get that
Job!" So delay get the word out.
This is the hiring season and we want ALL to
be prepared. "
I did delay the word out, and I look forward to
meeting with reps of the compaines!
Truly dumb...
Today,
Tuesday, October 09, 2007, we received an email informing us of a seminar
class that purports to teach us how to identify bunk - or Bullshit, as Penn
Gillette would want us to say.
Apparently, we need this course, as another email informing
us of the cancellation of a school-wide battery recycling program, and in that,
partly, telling us to just throw away any alkaline batteries, as THEY ARE NOT
RECYCLABLE.
True enough. No Recycling Center will take them.
But, electronics labs and students will.
This, I thought was the real purpose behind the original
campaign, since I have knowledge that, outside of cold fusion reaction, will
save the modern world as we care to know it!
Alkaline batts, as they may not be recyclable, are by no
means NON-RECHARGEABLE.
And, to prove, non-adventurous
consumers click
this. Great thinkers,
click this.
And, now learn (actual samples dug up from the original
email ! ):
1. Alkaline batteries are not recyclable.
Throw them in the trash. (We now know this is wrong, right?)
2. Lithium and nickel cadmium batteries
will be accepted at any Ace Hardware or Radio Shack store. Both stores send
them out when they get a certain amount. Make sure that you tape
both ends of each battery with black
[actually, it must be black - no other color
is acceptable] electrical tape before taking
them to either one of these stores. They will not accept them if
the ends are not taped.
3. Lead acid batteries (such as car
batteries) will be accepted at any automotive center that sells batteries.
**** If you are not sure what
category battery you use, look on the battery itself. It should be labeled.
****
And, now it's time for a cigarette - if I smoked - because
I am truly satisfied.
MORE DUMB TO COME!